题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
[主观题]
When the police caught up with him, Mr. Foster had to ________ that he'd broken th
e speed limit.
A、confirm
B、confess
C、confuse
D、confront
查看答案
如果结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
如果结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
A、confirm
B、confess
C、confuse
D、confront
如果结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
更多“When the police caught up with…”相关的问题
—______are you trying to prove to the police？
—Where I was last night.
A. What
B. Why
C. How
D. When
A、concise
B、simple
C、long
D、short
A.was just pouring out
B.just was poured out
C.just have been pouring out
D.had just been poured out
Driver: Sure.(8).
Police: You weren’t wearing your seat belt while driving.
Driver: You stopped me just for that.
Police: Yes.(9).
Driver: Since when？
Police: (10).
A.Since January 1, 1993.
B.That’s ridiculous.
C.What did I do wrong？
D.In California you can be stopped for not fastening your seat belt.
The man didn' t try to run(4)when he saw the policeman He just smiled and said to the woman."I want to give this purse ack to you, madam.I think you (5) it on the street.”(完型填空)
A.Wearing
B.Behind
C.Too
D.Dropped
E.Away
Even a careful motorist(开汽车的人 ) may commit a motoring offence (违法 ).In this case, he will appear in a police court .This is a court ruled by a judge without a jury (陪审团 ).A judge has powers to pass sentence for relatively minor offences only ;serious charges are dealt with by a judge and a jury.
In certain cases, a motoring offender may choose to go before a judge and a jury ,instead of appearing before just a judge .A court is also used for the conduct of preliminary investigations to dedermine whether or not a motoring offender shall appear for trial in a higher court.
When his case comes up in court ,the motorist hears his name called by the clerk of the court, and comes forward to identify himself.The judge then calls for the policeman who charged the offender and asks him to give evidence.
He is expected to ive an account of what happened when the offence was committed and to mention any special circumstances.For example the offence may have been partly due to the foolishness of another motorist.It would be unwise for the motoring offender to exaggerate this.It will not help his case to try to blame someone else for his own mistake. If you are guilty ,it is of course wise to admit it and say you're sorry for committing the offence and taking up the court's time .Judges are not heartless and a motorist may be lucky enough to hear one say ：“ You've got good reasons ,but you have broken the law and I'll have to impose a fine .Pay five pounds.Next case.”
Some short-tempered people forget that both policemen and judges have a public duty to perform,and aren rude to them. This does not pay! A judge will not let off an offender merely because he is respectful,but a polite law-breaker may certainly hope that the judge will extend him what tolerance the law permits.
31、Even a careful motorist may be asked to go to a police court for______.
A、an injury
B、a motoring offence
C、refusing to pay a fine
D、being rude to the policeman
32、The underlined word “ one ” (paragraph 5) refers to _____.
A、a jury member
B、a police officer
C、a motorist
D、a judge
33、A motoring offender is usually charged by ______.
A、a judge
B、a jury
C、a policeman
D、another motorist
34、It is foolish for a motoring offender to _______.
A、overstate another motorist's mistake
B、mention someone else's foolishness
C、argue that he is not guilty
D、choose to go before a jury
35、If a man knows that he is guilty, he should ______.
A、be polite to the policeman and the judge
B、try his best to appear before just a judge
C、save the court's time and pay the fine
D、admit the wrong and say sorry to the court
California has asked the justices to refrain from a sweeping ruling particularly one that upsets the old assumption that authorities may search through the possessions of suspects at the time of their arrest. It is hard, the state argues, for judges to assess the implications of new and rapidly changing technologies. The court would be recklessly modest if it followed California’s advice. Enough of the implications are discernable, even obvious, so that the justices can and should provide updated guidelines to police, lawyers and defendants.
They should start by discarding California’s lame argument that exploring the contents of a smart phone — a vast storehouse of digital information — is similar to, say, rifling through a suspect’s purse. The court has ruled that police don’t violate the Fourth Amendment when they sift through the wallet or pocketbook of an arrestee without a warrant. But exploring one’s smart phone is more like entering his or her home. A smart phone may contain an arrestee’s reading history, financial history, medical history and comprehensive records of recent correspondence. The development of “cloud computing,” meanwhile, has made that exploration so much the easier.
Americans should take steps to protect their digital privacy. But keeping sensitive information on these devices is increasingly a requirement of normal life. Citizens still have a right to expect private documents to remain private and protected by the Constitution’s prohibition on unreasonable searches.
As so often is the case, stating that principle doesn’t ease the challenge of line-drawing. In many cases, it would not be overly onerous for authorities to obtain a warrant to search through phone contents. They could still invalidate Fourth Amendment protections when facing severe, urgent circumstances, and they could take reasonable measures to ensure that phone data are not erased or altered while a warrant is pending. The court, though, may want to allow room for police to cite situations where they are entitled to more freedom.
But the justices should not swallow California’s argument whole. New, disruptive technology sometimes demands novel applications of the Constitution’s protections. Orin Kerr, a law professor, compares the explosion and accessibility of digital information in the 21st century with the establishment of automobile use as a virtual necessity of life in the 20th: The justices had to specify novel rules for the new personal domain of the passenger car then; they must sort out how the Fourth Amendment applies to digital information now.
26. The Supreme Court will work out whether, during an arrest, it is legitimate to
A.prevent suspects from deleting their phone contents.
B.search for suspects’ mobile phones without a warrant.
C.check suspects’ phone contents without being authorized.
D.prohibit suspects from using their mobile phones.
The author’s attitude toward California’s argument is one ofA.disapproval
B.indifference
C.tolerance
D.cautiousness
The author believes that exploring one’s phone contents is comparable toA.principles are hard to be clearly expressed
B.the court is giving police less room for action
C.citizens’ privacy is not effectively protected
D.phones are used to store sensitive information
Orin Kerr’s comparison is quoted to indicate thatA.the Constitution should be implemented flexibly
B.new technology requires reinterpretation of the Constitution
C.California’s argument violates principles of the Constitution.
D.principles of the Constitution should never be altered
The author believes that exploring one’s phone contents is comparable toA.getting into one’s residence
B.handling one’s historical records
C.scanning one’s correspondences
D.going through one’s wallet
请帮忙给出每个问题的正确答案和分析，谢谢！
Shortly after my friend hadleft, I went to a restaurant near the hotel to get something to eat. Because Icouldn’t speak a word of English, I couldn’t tell the waiter what I wanted. Iwas very upset and started to make some gestures, but the waiter didn’tunderstand me. Finally, I ordered the same thing the man at the next table waseating. After dinner, I started to walk along Broadway until I came to Times Square with its movie theatres, neon lights, andhuge crowds of people. I did not feel tired, so I continued to walk around thecity. I wanted to see everything on my first day. I knew it was impossible, butI wanted to try.
When I returned to thehotel, I was exhausted, but I couldn’t sleep because I kept hearing the fireand police sirens during the night. I lay awake and thought about New York. It was a verybig and interesting city with many tall buildings and big cars, and full ofnoise and busy people. I also decided right then that I had to learn to speakEnglish.
6. On the way tohis hotel, the writer _____________.
a.was silent all the time
b.kept talking to his friend
c.showed his friend something he brought with him
d.looked out of the window with great interest
7. He did nothave what he really wanted, because _________.
a.he only made some gestures
b.he did not order at all
c.the waiter was unwilling to serve
d.he could not make himself understood
8. The waiter______________.
a.knew what he would order
b.finally understood what he said
c.served the same thing the man at the next table was having
d.took the order through his gestures
9. After dinner,he _______________.
a.walked back to the hotel right away
b.went to the movies
c.did some shopping on Broadway
d.had a walking tour about the city
10. That night hecould not sleep, because ______________.
a.he did not know what to do the next day
b.he was not tired at all
c.he was thinking about his great city
d.he kept hearing the fire and police sirens
二. 介词填空: (按课本课文内容填入适当的介词)
11. Successfullanguage learners are learners _____ a purpose.
12. Successful languagelearners are independent learners. They do not depend _____ the book or theteacher.
13. It is just like a24-hour library, which enables us to search ____ the right information we needby simply typing in some key words.
14. It is necessary for themto learn the language in order to communicate ____ these people and to learnfrom them.
15. ____ the other hand, ifyour language learning has been lessthan successful, you might do well to try some of the techniques outlinedabove.
